NR716 Week 7 Discussion Appraising Systematic Reviews
Purpose
The purpose of this discussion is to demonstrate your understanding of the review and appraisal of a systematic review that includes systematic review with meta-analysis, or meta-synthesis, and to use skills in the appraisal of research studies in your future role as a DNP-prepared nurse. Importantly, you will review the background and intention of the systematic review research study. As you work to find solutions to practice problems, critical review and appraisal of systematic reviews are required.
Instructions
Using the practice problem, you selected in NR715 or NR716, continue your search and appraisal of evidence by analyzing one systematic review research study. This research study should not be one that was used in NR715. Address the following in the discussion:
- Appraise the systematic review research study using the Johns Hopkins Research Appraisal Tool. Transfer your findings to the Johns Hopkins Individual Evidence Summary ToolLinks to an external site.Open this document with ReadSpeaker docReader .
- Analyze the evidence summary tool of the research study to address the following in the discussion:
- Determine whether the research design selected by the researchers—systematic review, systematic review with meta-analysis, or meta-synthesis —answers their stated research question. Explain your rationale.
- Based on information in the published study, explain if the researcher’s search was comprehensible and reproducible.
- Based on the Johns Hopkins Individual Evidence Summary Tool, determine if there is an evidence-based intervention in your appraised systematic review you might consider for translation to patients in your practice for your future practice change project. Explain your rationale.
- Based on the Johns Hopkins Individual Evidence Summary Tool, determine if you would use this systematic review research study as support for the analysis of your selected practice problem. Explain your rationale.
Attach your completed Johns Hopkins Individual Evidence Summary Tool and permalink to the selected research study.
Solution:NR716 Week 7 Discussion Appraising Systematic Reviews
The study selected is a systematic review with meta-analysis by Akinosun et al. (2021), which examines the effectiveness of digital technology interventions, including mobile phones, the internet, and wearables, in modifying cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors. The review provides a high-level evidence synthesis evaluating the effectiveness of digital health interventions in modifying CVD risk factors. This study systematically reviews 25 randomized controlled trials (RCTs), making it a Level I, high-quality (A) evidence based on the Johns Hopkins Evidence Appraisal Tool. The researchers use a rigorous and reproducible methodology, including adherence to PRISMA guidelines, multiple database searches, predefined inclusion/exclusion criteria, and PROSPERO registration for transparency.
Whether Research Design Answers the with Research Question
The study’s systematic review with meta-analysis design is appropriate for answering the evidence-based practice (EBP) question, “In adult patients with heart failure (HF) (P), how does implementing a digital consult (DC) strategy (I) compared to usual care (C) affect adherence to guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) (O) within a 12-week follow-up period (T)?” The review evaluates multiple digital health interventions, including mobile health (mHealth)….Click on the PayPal icon below to purchase full solution for $5
Related: (Solution) NR716 Week 8 Discussion Reflection on Learning and Practice Readiness