(Solution) NR715 Week 7 Assignment Synthesis Paper

NR715 Week 7 Assignment Synthesis Paper

Purpose

The purpose of this assignment is to present a revised evidence synthesis paper using the two quantitative descriptive articles from the Week 5 paper submission, integrating course faculty feedback. This includes revising all parts of the assignment as well as the Johns Hopkins Individual Evidence Summary Tool as recommended.  Also, please add new content identified below (Selection of Translation Science Model – 6f).

Instructions

Follow these guidelines when completing the assignment. Contact your course faculty if you have any questions.

  1. Review the directions and complete the Johns Hopkins Individual Evidence Summary ToolLinks to an external site.Open this document with ReadSpeaker docReader . Use the 2 quantitative descriptive studies. These must be recent research articles less than 5 years old and be related to a National Practice Problem.
  2. Use the most current version of Microsoft Word, which is the format for all Chamberlain University College of Nursing. You can tell the document is saved as the current version because it will end in “docx.”
  3. All Chamberlain University policies related to plagiarism must be observed. This written assignment will be screened for originality by Turnitin.
  4. Revise the paper from Week 5, addressing all course faculty feedback and adding the new section (6f).
  5. Review the rubric for the grading criteria.
  6. Use each component listed below as a Level I header in the APA formatted paper.

The assignment includes the following components:

  1. Title Page
  2. Introduction (Use the title of your paper) (1-2 paragraphs)
    1. Introduce the practice problem.
    2. Discuss your quantitative descriptive design research articles.
    3. Present the purpose of the paper.
  3. Analysis of the Practice Problem (1-2 paragraphs)
    1. Present the significance of the practice problem.
    2. Present the prevalence and incidence of the practice problem from the selected articles; you may use other sources for prevalence and incidence (such as the Centers for Disease Control and the World Health Organization).
  4. Evidence Synthesis: 2-3 paragraphs
    1. Using the two descriptive articles, write a synthesis of evidence to address the selected practice problem. Do not use the non-research evidence here in the synthesis. In the synthesis of evidence, include the following:
      1. Identify the main themes and salient evidence that emerge from the two articles. (Cited)
      2. Compare and contrast the main points from your two articles. (Cited)
      3. Present an objective overarching synthesis of research evidence about the practice problem. (Cited)
      4. This synthesis must be a summary of the merged themes and findings of the two articles and cannot be a review of each article separately.
  5. Appraisal of the Evidence to Address the Practice Problem: (1 paragraph)
    1. Include the following for both articles:
      1. Appraise the applicability of the evidence to describe the practice problem.
  6. Selection of a Translation Theory or Model (1-2 paragraphs)
    1. Present the components of the translation model or theory.
    2. Analyze the value of the translation science model or theory as the framework in a DNP practice change project.
  7. Conclusion
    1. In one concise paragraph, provide a clear and logical conclusion summarizing your main points in this assignment.
  8. Johns Hopkins Individual Evidence Summary Table:
    1. Completes all sections of the Summary Tables of Evidence using the Johns Hopkins Individual Evidence Summary Tool. Include the following:
      1. Includes two quantitative descriptive research studies.
      2. Complete all columns accurately and appraise the quality and levels of evidence.
  9. The Johns Hopkins Individual Evidence Summary Tool
    1. Include the completed Johns Hopkins Individual Evidence Summary Tool with this assignment. Do not embed the document in the paper.

Writing Requirements (APA format)

  • Scholarly writing is in the third person.
  • Length: 4-6 pages (not including title page or references page)
  • 1-inch margins
  • Double-spaced pages
  • 12-point Times New Roman or 11-point Arial font
  • Level I headers
  • In-text citations
  • Title page required
  • References page required
  • Standard English usage and mechanics
  • Revisions based on course faculty feedback from Week 5 Assignment

Solution: NR715 Week 7 Assignment Synthesis Paper

major aspect of evidence-based practice (EBP) is using current and relevant research evidence to inform practice (Kawar et al., 2023). One practice problem that could significantly benefit from EBP is heart disease, a chronic condition characterized by impaired functioning of the heart (Kaminsky et al., 2022). A review and synthesis of current research evidence can help inform the prevention and management of heart disease. Two quantitative research articles, “A descriptive study to assess the knowledge of risk factors of coronary artery disease (CAD)”, by George et al. (2021) and “Awareness and level of knowledge in preventing coronary heart disease among community sample” by Suarningsih and Suindrayasa (2020) were found relevant to the issue of heart disease. Being quantitative descriptive articles, these research systematically gathered and analyzed data to describe and/or summarize the patterns, frequencies, or trends of heart disease in given populations, without variable manipulation (Siedlecki, 2020). The purpose of this evidence synthesis paper is to synthesize the two quantitative descriptive articles. The sections include practice problem analysis, evidence synthesis, evidence appraisal to address the practice problem, and a conclusion. Also included in Appendix A is the Johns Hopkins individual evidence summary tool used to guide the evidence synthesis.

Analysis of the Practice Problem

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC] (2024), heart disease is a leading morbidity and mortality cause in the U.S. and across the globe, causing one death every 33 seconds in the U.S. It accounted for 702,880 deaths in 2022 (1/5 deaths). The annual costs of heart disease (2019-2020) amounted to about $252.2 billion annually (CDC, 2024). Heart disease is mainly a lifestyle and preventable disease, with the key risk factors being hypercholesteremia, smoking, hypertension, overweight/obesity, diabetes, physical inactivity, excessive alcohol consumption, and unhealthy diet (Kaminsky et al., 2022).

Evidence Synthesis

George et al. (2021) evaluated the knowledge about risk factors of CAD among patients in outpatient departments (OPDs) of MOSC Medical College Hospital in Kolenchery. A sample of 120 patients completed structured questionnaires. From the results, 71%, 25%, and 4% had respectively average, good, and poor knowledge of CAD risk factors. Their educational levels were found to their knowledge levels while other demographic variables (e.g. age, sex, and income) did not. The second study by Suarningsih and Suindrayasa (2020), aimed at describing the community awareness and knowledge level of cardiovascular health disease (CHD) risk factors using a sample of 284 respondents who have not been diagnosed with CHD. Data were collected through a cluster random sampling approach using the Heart Disease Fact Questionnaire (HDFQ). The findings reveal that most respondents were aware of significant CHD risk factors like smoking (89.1%), high cholesterol (86.6%), and uncontrolled blood pressure (85.9%), but were less informed about diabetes (50.7%) and physical activity (53.5%). Overall, 44.7% of the respondents demonstrated good awareness and knowledge, 38.4% were average, and 16.9% were poor.

From the evidence synthesis of the studies by George et al. (2021) and Suarningsih and Suindrayasa (2020), four themes were identified, the first being knowledge of risk factors. Both studies evaluate public awareness and knowledge of key risk factors associated with heart disease. Commonly identified risk factors such as smoking, high cholesterol levels, and uncontrolled blood pressure are well-recognized by respondents in both populations (George et al., 2021; Suarningsih & Suindrayasa, 2020). The second theme is educational gaps. Despite general awareness, both studies identify gaps in knowledge about specific risk factors. Suarningsih and Suindrayasa (2020) found low awareness of diabetes, HDL cholesterol, and physical activity as risk factors for CHD while George et al. (2021) identified low awareness of how familial history impacts CAD risk and inadequate understanding of healthy lifestyle practices. The third theme is the significance of public education. Both studies stress the importance of health education programs to address these gaps and promote preventive measures for coronary conditions (George et al., 2021; Suarningsih & Suindrayasa, 2020). The last theme is population-specific findings. While each study focuses on specific populations; a rural village in Indonesia (Suarningsih & Suindrayasa, 2020) and a hospital-based sample in India (George et al., 2021) both agree on the need for tailored interventions to improve knowledge levels in different demographic contexts.

Following a comparison and contrast of the two articles, the similarities noted are that….Click on the PayPal icon below to purchase full solution for $10

Related: (Solution) NR715 Week 7 Discussion Stakeholders

Related: (Solution) NR715 Week 8 Discussion Reflection on Learning and Practice Readiness