(Solution) NR715 Week 3 Assignment Critique and Summary of Quantitative Research

NR715 Week 3 Assignment Critique and Summary of Quantitative Research

Purpose

Learning to critique and summarize research is an important skill for you to master. The purpose of this assignment is to 1) complete the Johns Hopkins Research Evidence Appraisal Tool, 2) accurately develop the Johns Hopkins Individual Evidence Summary Tool, and 3) analyze a quantitative descriptive research article.

You will critique the quantitative descriptive research article accurately using the Johns Hopkins Research Evidence Appraisal Tool and then accurately complete the Johns Hopkins Individual Evidence Summary Tool.

Instructions

Follow these guidelines when completing each component of the assignment. Contact your course faculty if you have questions.

  1. Review the characteristics of quantitative research within the Explore section of this week’s module and readings.
  2. Systematic reviews are not permitted for this assignment.
  3. Use the most current version of Microsoft Word, which is the format for all Chamberlain University College of Nursing. You can tell the document is saved as the current version because it will end in “docx.”
  4. Review the rubric for the grading criteria.

The assignment includes the following components:

  1. Create a Title page.
  2. Write a narrative critique of the quantitative, descriptive research article using the Johns Hopkins Research Evidence Appraisal ToolLinks to an external site.Open this document with ReadSpeaker docReader and Johns Hopkins Individual Evidence Summary ToolLinks to an external site.Open this document with ReadSpeaker docReader . Your critique should be in paragraph format.
    1. Present an overview of the article’s findings.
    2. Discuss how the article findings relate to the practice problem.
    3. Explain how the Johns Hopkins Individual Evidence Summary Tool assists in the critique of the article about your practice problem.
  3. The reference page must be in the correct APA format.
  4. Johns Hopkins Research Evidence Appraisal Tool
    1. The Johns Hopkins Research Evidence Appraisal Tool is included with the assignment.
    2. Accurately completes all sections in the Article Summary Information on pages 1-3.
      Enter the Evidence level and quality rating.
    3. Enter the robust study findings.
    4. Complete the quantitative and quality sections, and all boxes are completed on page 2.
    5. The Quantitative appraisal is completed as A, B, or C on page 3.
  5. Johns Hopkins Individual Evidence Summary Tool
    1. The Johns Hopkins Individual Evidence Tool is included with the assignment.
    2. All columns are completed and are accurate.
    3. Use the Johns Hopkins Individual Evidence Summary Tool to summarize the descriptive study and complete all columns accurately.
    4. Enter a complete current APA formatted reference and permalink.
    5. Enter the research paradigm and research study design.
    6. Enter detailed information about the sampling plan, size, and setting.
    7. Include the specific intervention, and/or explicit information on what the researcher was studying.
    8. Enter in detail the findings by the researcher.
    9. Describe the tools used or how outcomes were measured. Include Cronbach alpha if a tool was used.
    10. Enter limitations described by the researcher. Also, add your appraisal if limitations were not described.
    11. Enter the level of the research study and the quality. Transfer this from the Johns Hopkins Appraisal Tool.

Writing Requirements (APA format)

  • Scholarly writing is in the third person.
  • Title page required
  • Length: 1-2 pages (not including title page or references page)
  • 1-inch margins
  • Double-spaced
  • 12-point Times New Roman or 11-point Arial font
  • Use of level 1 headers to separate each section
  • References and citations in proper APA format (current version)
  • In-text citations
  • Reference page required
  • Standard English usage and mechanics

Solution: NR715 Week 3 Assignment Critique and Summary of Quantitative Research

Critique and Summary of Quantitative Research

            The quantitative descriptive article that relates to the identified national practice problem, heart disease is, “A descriptive study to assess the knowledge of risk factors of coronary artery disease (CAD)”, by George et al. (2021). The study sought to evaluate knowledge about CAD risk factors among patients in outpatient departments (OPDs) of MOSC Medical College Hospital in Kolenchery. Using a structured questionnaire, the researchers assessed 120 patients, revealing that 71% had average knowledge, 25% had good knowledge, and only 4% had poor knowledge. The patients’ education level significantly influenced knowledge but other demographic variables such as age, sex, and income did not. This study provides foundational insights into patient awareness of CAD risk factors, which are crucial in the implementation of targeted prevention interventions.

The findings and relevant to heart disease as they highlight a significant gap in patient knowledge regarding CAD risk factors. While most participants had average knowledge, the lack….Click on the PayPal icon below to purchase full solution for $10

Related: (Solution) NR715 Week 3 Discussion Quantitative Article Critique