NR585NP Week 3 Discussion Quantitative Scholarly Literature

Preparing the Collaboration Café

Follow these guidelines when completing each component of the Collaboration Café. Contact your course faculty if you have questions.

General Instructions

Professional nurses must be equipped to critique scholarly literature and discern its value for application to practice. Select one current, quantitative scholarly article related to your PICOT question. Appraise the article using the General Appraisal Overview for All Studies Tool (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2023, Appendix C; see also Box 6.1 in Chapter 6). Summarize your appraisal of the article in your own words.

Include the following sections:

1. Application of Course Knowledge: Answer all questions/criteria with explanations and detail.
   1. Provide an overview of the study
      1. Purpose
      2. Study design
      3. Ethics review
   2. Describe the study
      1. Research question or hypothesis
      2. Study aims
      3. Sampling technique, sample size, and characteristics
   3. Major variables studied
      1. Independent variable
      2. Dependent variables
      3. How were the data analyzed? Were the statistics used appropriately?
      4. Were there any untoward events during the conduct of the study?
   4. Explain why and how you could use the study results in your practice to make a difference in client outcomes. If you cannot use the results, why not?
   5. Include a complete APA reference and Chamberlain Library permalink for the selected article.

Solution: NR585NP Week 3 Discussion Quantitative Scholarly Literature

The quantitative research that relates to my PICOT, “In postoperative adult surgical patients (Population), what is the effect of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols (Intervention) in comparison to standard opioid-centered pain management (Comparison) on postoperative pain levels (Outcomes) within the first 30 days post-surgery (Time)?” is a randomized controlled trial by Chiewhatpong et al. (2022). The study investigates the effectiveness of the ERAS protocol in improving recovery outcomes, specifically reducing hospital stay and postoperative pain in patients undergoing open gynecologic oncology surgery. It measured outcomes including hospital length of stay, pain levels, opioid consumption, and postoperative recovery factors such as gastrointestinal function and mobility. The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Chiang Mai University’s Faculty of Medicine, ensuring ethical compliance and obtaining informed consent from all participants.

The research hypothesis was that the ERAS protocol would result in shorter hospital stays and better postoperative outcomes (e.g. reduced pain and faster recovery of gastrointestinal function) compared to standard care. The aim was to determine if ERAS could reduce hospital stay and postoperative pain. Secondary aims included analyzing opioid usage, postoperative mobility, and……Click on the PayPal icon below to purchase full solution for $5

Related: (Solution) NR585NP Week 4 Discussion Qualitative Scholarly Literature