NR715 Week 4 Discussion Qualitative Article Critique

Purpose

The purpose of this discussion is for you to search for qualitative evidence that contributes to practice change and improvement of a National Practice Problem. You will be proficient in research critique when using the Johns Hopkins Appraisal ToolLinks to an external site.Open this document with ReadSpeaker docReader . You will gain experience in judging qualitative research for applicability to the practice problem. The critique of research focuses on potential solutions and interventions to improve outcomes.

Instructions

1. Conduct a search of the Chamberlain library to find a single source of qualitative research on the National Practice Problem selected in Week 3. Be sure to use the most recent evidence available (within the past 5 years).
2. The qualitative source of evidence you select must be a single source of evidence. Systematic reviews are not permitted for this assignment.
3. Present the written reference and permalink for the article selected.
4. Summarize the article to include the method, design, aim/purpose, sample size and sample type, key findings/results, level, and quality grade.
5. Describe the value of the qualitative research findings related to the National Practice Problem.
6. Attach the completed Johns Hopkins Appraisal Tool to the discussion.

Solution: NR715 Week 4 Discussion Qualitative Article Critique

The qualitative study that relates to my selected national practice problem, heart disease, is by Tighe et al. (2022). The study aimed to explore the perceptions of individuals with CVD and healthcare professionals regarding a digital platform, “Salvio,” designed to support personalized self-management of CVD. It sought to identify key platform features and considerations for its development. The study was a two-phase design using focus groups, interviews, and activity-based workshops. Thematic analysis (inductive for Phase 1, deductive for Phase 2) was used for data interpretation. Data collection methods included focus groups with CVD patients interviews with healthcare professionals in Phase 1 and co-design workshops with users to brainstorm platform features in Phase 2. The study sample included 26 participants (18 community-dwelling CVD outpatients with internet access and 8 healthcare professionals including nurses, doctors, cardiologists, physiotherapists, and researchers in CVD management). The key findings showed that facilitators using the digital technologies included enhanced accessibility to self-management tools (especially for residents in remote areas), trust in the platform when endorsed…Click on the PayPal icon below to purchase full solution for $5

Related:(Solution) NR715 Week 5 Discussion Evidence Synthesis

Related:(Solution) NR715 Week 5 Assignment Evidence Synthesis